Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Manipuri woman attacks by 3 men in B’lore


BENGALURU — A Manipuri woman was allegedly assaulted by three men here in Indranagar on the night of 21 June 2018.

The victim was badly beaten by three local men. “It was a shameful incident three men attacks one Manpuri woman in Indranagar over a petty issue of parking. One bike was parked in front of the woman's shop and Mr M (identify unknown) started quarrelling with her not to park the bike,” says Dr Lalrinawmi Ralte (Rini), President of Northeast Helpline, Bangalore.
Share:

Protest at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi against Racism & Racial Attack on NE people 14/02/2014

Photos Courtesy: Ginza Vualzong@zogam.com fb








Share:

Some recent incidents on NE people

Collections of unwanted incidents among the North East people in Delhi and NCR collected from Facebook group North East Support Centre & Helpline...


NE girls molested by landlord
Two chakma girls from Arunachal Pradesh was molested in Gurgaon on 13/02/2014 night by the landlord and his friends. The girls ran away and in the morning the landlord came again and tried forcing one of the girl's friends to sign a paper. Tigra Village, Gurgaon where the girls stay falls under Sadar Police Stations. Heard that FIR already lodged. (Source: Seven Sister's Project).

NE Girl Robbed in Delhi

A staff nurse from Manipur, who works in GB Pant hospital, was robbed by unknown man near the hospital last night. The incident occurred while she was returning home at around 9.30pm on 12/02/2014.

The man forcibly snatched away her mobile phone and her bag [which contained important documents and money/Rs 7000].
 

"This incident happened in a busy place. While our sister was confronting the man face-to-face, there were many people around her who simply stared at her. No one helps her during the scuffle took place. Atlast the man decamped with her things,” sources told NE Helpline few minutes ago. FIR lodged.
Top of Form



'Racial' heat on Doordarshan

The Telegraph | Sumi Sukanya | New Delhi, Feb. 11:

Acting on a complaint filed by a group of Delhi University teachers and students hailing from the Northeast — who accused Doordarshan of being discourteous towards them and showing “racial bias” after inviting them for a talk show on DD News — Prasar Bharati has formed a fact-finding committee to look into the allegations.

“We were told that the teachers would be put on the panel but on reaching, the studio we were told that they just wanted us to be part of the audience as they had already selected six panellists. When we protested, they started insulting us. The DD staff, particularly anchor Sharma and producer of the show Subhash Jain, were discourteous and they misbehaved with us.

Share:

24-year-old boy from Manipur stabbed in Delhi's Saket

New Delhi: A day after two Manipuri boys landed up in hospital after being attacked, another youngster from the Northeastern state has been attacked in the national capital on Tuesday morning.

In an apparent robbery attempt, the victim, a 24-year-old man, was stabbed in the stomach by unknown men. The incident took place in Delhi's Saket at around 4 am when he was returning from work.

He was rushed to a Saket hospital where he is condition is reported to be critical.
Prima facie it appears to be a case of robbery as his mobile phone was snatched by the assailants.

Delhi Police Commissioner has reached the spot and investigation is on.

This comes a day after two Manipuri boys in their early 20s were attacked in Delhi's Ambedkar Nagar area. As per the latest reports, one of the victim is still in hospital undergoing treatment.

Source:ibnlive

Clips from FB-zogam.com:

Delhi a North East mi dawt liam om zel.
Tuzing kal dak 4:30 velin na sem khin a hong kiik unaupa Khupsiangen Thangkhal vai ten Saket ah tem in ana dawt. A dawt na uh centimeter 1 vel a thuuk chi uh. Roberry case di dan a muanmoh ahi. Tu in amah Saket City Hospital ah kikem lel. Poi petmah hizel.

Mulam Thang Amah nasep khin hlou in Praise and worship zankhua vak a The New Generation Church te kianga vatel in zingsan chianga nasem d ahiziak a 3am vela a inn zuan akik a accident um hzaw h
Share:

The foreign' Indians

It was the rarest of spectacles, an alignment of political stars that no astrologer could have predicted: Rahul Gandhi, Narendra Modi and Arvind Kejriwal, all lending their support to a single agitation. Even more unexpectedly, the agitation in question was one being staged by students from India’s Northeast region.

For decades now, that region and the “mainland” of India (to which it is connected tenuously by a land corridor 22 kilometres wide at its narrowest point) have had a troubled relationship. Differences in culture, religion and food habits, and even in physical appearances, have deepened the sense of alienation felt by many from the region who made the journey to India’s bustling metropolises in search of education or jobs.

It was his appearance that sparked off the fight that seems to have led to the tragic death of Nido Tania, a student from Arunachal Pradesh, in Delhi’s Lajpat Nagar. Police records and the testimony of his friends show that Tania was severely beaten up by a group of youth after he broke a shop’s display window. He had stopped to ask for directions, and been met with a racist taunt, which infuriated him.

Such taunts are “par for the course”, says Nicholas Kharkongor, a writer and director of mixed Naga and Khasi descent who lives in Delhi. He’s been in Delhi and Mumbai for 20 years now, and has learnt to blank out these taunts, he says. His forbearance has meant that he has not found himself in “any sort of extreme situation”.
“If in a place you have a singular exotica, a few people from elsewhere, you will be nice to them. If there are a lot, fascination will give way to xenophobia. Delhi has a huge Northeastern population,” he says.

The size of this population came into notice in 2012 after rumours circulating on SMS sparked off an exodus of people from the region who live and work in cities such as Delhi, Pune and Bengaluru. The incident drew the attention of Prof Sanjib Baruah, an authority on the region who teaches at Bard College in New York. In a paper for the January 2013 issue of Himal Southasian, Prof Baruah noted the presence of at least 2 lakh Northeasterners in Delhi.

In an email interview, he wrote that while he was very disturbed by the Tania incident, he saw a silver lining. “I am glad that Kejriwal and Rahul Gandhi went to the protests. The political establishment appears to be taking this incident more seriously than previous racial incidents. I hope the discussion leads to the recognition of such crimes as hate crimes,” he wrote.

Watershed moment
These protests could prove to be a watershed moment given the recognition from all major political parties that there is racial discrimination being faced by some Indians in India, a fact that has long been ignored or denied. It is also a watershed moment in the very vocal identification by the protesters from the Northeast of themselves as Indians. The region has been home to numerous separatist insurgencies down the decades since 1947, and the Indian identity was not something everyone from the region sported easily.

Borkung Hrangkhawl, a rap musician from Tripura who lives in Delhi, is the son of a legendary insurgent leader from the state, Bijoy Kumar Hrangkhawl. His father gave up the gun after 10 years of armed struggle, in 1988, and took to politics. Asked whether he feels Indian, Borkung paused for a moment to say that it was a loaded question before answering “yes”.
“A lot of us don’t feel Indian,” says Kharkongor, but adds that he is not among those. “I feel very Indian,” he says.
Prof. Baruah, who authored a seminal text called India Against Itself on the politics of nationality, says, “Northeasterners are seeking integration as equal citizens, which is not the same as assimilation”.

The younger generation of writers, thinkers and musicians from the region seem to agree with this view.

Ankush Saikia, an author who divides his time between Tezpur and Shillong and lived in Delhi earlier, says “focusing on differences rather than factors that bring us together is harmful for everyone in the long run”.

He agrees that it is a difficult and complex matter, and says, “We need to look at the treatment of people from outside the Northeast in the Northeast itself, and the many opportunities available to and availed by people from the Northeast in the rest of India.”

Perhaps the worst sufferers of the periodic bouts of violence against “outsiders” have been the Bengali minority who scattered throughout the Northeast for generations.
Sonali Dutta, who now lives in the United Kingdom, recalls an incident from her college days in Shillong.

“It was during Durga Puja and I was walking back home from the pandal with my boyfriend just after dusk. As we approached a quiet, poorly lit stretch on the street leading down to my house, six Khasi boys surrounded us. One of them exposed a knife in his inner leather jacket pocket. While they were busy punching and kicking my boyfriend along with profuse racial verbal abuses, I managed to slip out of their circle to look for help. In the meantime, my boyfriend broke out of their loop, caught my hand and yelled, ‘run!’ I threw my handbag and we ran for our lives.”
There’s a sense of xenophobia in the Northeast, says Kharkongor. “It needs to go…I don’t know what can be done about it,” he says. The situation there is “more grim”, he adds.

“Bridges need to be built between this region and the rest of the country so that there can be understanding and interaction, and ultimately, mutual respect,” says Mitra Phukan, the Assam-based president of the Northeast Writers’ Forum.

Mary Therese Kurkalang, director of the Cultures of Peace Festival, is at the forefront of efforts to build such bridges. She left Shillong to live in Delhi in 1998 and has been there since. “I consciously choose to live in India’s capital that is not always known for being kind to women or minorities or to anyone at many and various levels,” she says, adding, “There is also much that this city offers. I came to this city with `5,000, a suitcase full of synthetic clothes, a Class 12 Pass certificate, and a great deal of hope! After 16 years, I can look back and say, ‘Delhi you didn’t let me down!’ I run a company of my own, know thousands of people (and not just on social media), I have a wonderful Punjabi landlady in whose flat I have lived for 11 years running! I celebrate Christmas, Id and Diwali with equal gusto. So every now and then, if someone asks me ‘aap kahaan se ho’, I patiently explain to them where Shillong is, starting from Kolkata, then to Assam and a 100 kilometres up to Shillong — the capital of Meghalaya ‘the abode of clouds’ where perhaps a bit of me always floats.”


Source: Deccan Chronicle, Hyderabad 11/02/2014
Share:

Cant fight racism by soft power alone

At a discussion on Doordarshan in the studio at Mandi House in New Delhi on Friday, several students and professionals from the Northeast spoke with anger and sadness about the discrimination they face on a daily level.

Words which are barred by court edicts such as “Chinky” still remain in common use, filling them with anger, but also a sense of despair.


That they continue to work, study and live in metros like Delhi redounds to their credit and to the city’s shame. This issue is not unique to the region or its people; they live in a country and societies steeped in prejudice, where Dalits, women, religious minorities and tribals are constant targets of violence, abuse and harm; this is happening as communities and individuals rise against the repressive behaviour that has characterised social conduct for centuries.

This is the broader narrative in which the sporadic violence and daily abuse against so many of those from the Northeast takes place. What is important to recognise is that so many of them are speaking out courageously, mobilising and standing for their rights. Yet, few turn to the state for succour or protection. A survey conducted recently by my Centre on challenges faced by women from the region in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru and Calcutta says that few of the women who faced molestation, harassment, humiliation or intimidation of any kind wanted to go to the police for help. Many said they did not think it would be of any use while others said they didn’t want to be further humiliated.

This stinging perception of law enforcers underlines a basic principle: that police forces in metropolitan cities must be more representative of demography and sensitive to concerns of different ethnic, religious and language groups, not the “local” majority. Thus, while behavioural change is crucial, it will take time. So does changing laws. But, recruitment rules can be changed, as can retraining police.

One way of dealing with ignorance on an issue like this is to spread knowledge, especially through curricula in schools, colleges and universities. The school and university networks need to do this rigourously. Too many committees have written on these issues; very little has been implemented.

This is not going to be an easy task. Take the case of the United States: there was a time there when the pejorative “ni**er” word was used extensively when referring to Afro-Americans. Anyone who uses it these days there runs the risk of being hustled away by police and a jail term for racial abuse. It took decades for this to happen, to upturn people’s views, to end segregation in the “land of the free and the brave”. It took courageous men and women to do that, black and white, who braved police batons and dogs — leaders like Martin Luther King, who held no office as he pursued his dream of freedom and equality, and fell to an assassin’s bullet. Presidents and politicians supported him as did cultural icons like Pete Seeger. Laws were necessary to end discrimination, but this couldn’t happen in isolation without a robust human rights movement, the role of media and educators.

For times, tides and attitudes to change, the democratic deficit can be bridged with a combination of the power of justice and the widest dissemination of cultural, historic and social knowledge. There must be the sure understanding that the use of the word “Chinky” can mean jail. Use the Prevention of Atrocities against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act. We shall overcome, but not by soft power alone: meet the sting of discrimination with the full force of the law.


Sanjoy Hazarika is Director of the Centre for North East Studies and Policy Research, Jamia Millia Islamia, and author, columnist and documentary film maker. Views espressed are personal.

Source: Deccan Chronicle, Hyderabad 11/02/2014
Share:

Days after Nido Tania's death, two more boys from North East attacked

New Delhi:  Two boys from the North East were allegedly beaten with sticks last night at a south Delhi neighbourhood, less than two weeks after the death of Nido Tania in what his friends described as a racist attack. The boys, who belong to Manipur, were allegedly attacked at Madangir in south Delhi by a biker.

Courtesy: NDTV.com
One of them, Ginkhansuan Naulak, is still being treated at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). 

The incident surfaces at a time several groups from the North East are protesting the death of 20-year-old Nido Tania, a student of Arunachal Pradesh, after being beaten with iron rods and sticks at south Delhi's Lajpat Nagar market on January 29. 

Nido was found dead in his bed hours after he was allegedly beaten by men who allegedly ridiculed him for his blonde hair and shouted racist slurs at him. An autopsy report has confirmed that he died of injuries to his head and face as a result of that attack. Nido's parents had maintained that he died due to the beating, but the police said they could act only after a medical report.

Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal joined protesters demanding justice for him at candlelight vigils last week.

Politicians across parties have vowed to work with activists and students from the North East to address their recurring concerns of being racially targeted in Delhi and other cities.

Source: ndtv.com
Share:

Protests in Imphal against attacks on NE people in Delhi

IMPHAL: Imphal witnessed sporadic protests on Sunday as several organizations took to the streets in various parts of the city, protesting against the rise in crime against north east people in the national Capital.

The renewed attacks on NE people began with the assault on two Manipuri women by local goons at Kotla Mubarakpur on January 25, followed by the killing of an Arunachal Pradesh student, Nido Tania, on January 29, allegedly by some shop keepers at Lajpat Nagar market in Delhi. Friday night's alleged rape of another Manipuri minor girl at Munirka compounded the anger of NE people.

Members of the Manipur unit of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) staged a protest at Nagamapal traffic point in the heart of Imphal.

The serial attacks have raised serious doubts about the Indian citizenship of NE people, rued an ABVP leader. The ABVP leaders demanded that the Centre should take stringent measures to ensure no such incident takes place in the national capital in future and sought fitting punishment for the perpetrators.

The New Generation Youth Wing, Manipur, held a candlelight march at Tiddim ground here. The members sought measures to ensure no racism, no discrimination and no harassment against NE people in other parts of the country. Members of the Royal Riders Manipur (RRM) organized a motorcycle rally in the capital city protesting against racial discrimination.


Parents here are now apprehensive about sending their children to Delhi for education or employment in view of the serial attacks on the NE people. "Since Delhi is not safe for us, we have now decided to send our children to other cities for pursuing education. We feel Delhi is the crime capital," said Tomba Sharma, an Imphal resident.

Share:

Bangalore University sets up separate hostel for Northeastern students

Bangalore: After the tragic death of Arunachal boy Nido Taniam in Delhi, one the largest varsities in India - the Bangalore University - has now set up a separate hostel for Northeastern students. The university said that the idea behind it is to protect students from racial discrimination.

"We will build the hostel, install CCTV cameras, make security arrangements and put security also. That's how we can protect the safety and interest of the north east," said B Thimme Gowda, Vice-Chancellor, Bangalore University.

While students from the Northeast have a mixed opinion on a special hostel for them, the larger question is, will such a move isolate them further in the name of security? Will such a hostel prevent their mingling with others, failing the very purpose of integration? A 19-year-old BA student, S Henna from Manipur, who stays as a paying guest near her college, has a mixed feelings over the proposal.

"This hostel is going to provide protection only in the hostel but they aren't going to give security throughout the places wherever we go. When we are in hostel, yea, we are secure but what happens when we are outside? We can't just stay there, live there and just stick to the hostel," said Henna.

"I don't think it is necessary because we all have our own places like flats, PGs. I think it should be open for the working class," said another girl.
But there are people who support this idea. "I think it's a good idea but personally, I think we should involve the others, with locals so that we can live together peacefully," said a boy from the Northeast.

Meanwhile, the university has defended its plan saying efforts will also be made to mainstream Northeastern students. "We may accommodate 50 per cent of people of Northeast and also from other places for interactions," said Thimme Gowda.

It has been only 2 years, since Bangalore witnessed a temporary exodus of Northeastern students after fears of racist attacks. And now, days after Taniam's death, the university has said it's only reflecting the fears of immigrant students.

Source: IBNlive
Share:

Racism, Our Dirty Secret

Prejudice based on one’s regional origins
 is deep-seated among Indians, including the police
-Indrajit Hazra

Article 14 of the Constitution deals with ‘Right to Equality’. It tells us with the straightest of faces that ‘The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.’ The very following sentence in the country’s operations manual is Article 15(1) that deals with ‘Fundamental Rights’. It says even more pithily, ‘The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.’ 

    Last Friday, Delhi high court pulled up the police and the state government for lack of progress on the case of 19-year-old Nido Tania, a student from Arunachal Pradesh, who died in the city following a racist attack. 

    Now, you can take your pick from all the constitutional categories mentioned above to illustrate how the real world strays from the scripture when it comes to equality before the law or when reassuring that the state is absolutely against any kind of discriminatory behaviour on its part. But with Nido’s death, the result of injuries received after a racist attack, let us stick to the statutory discrimination on grounds of race. 

    Much has been made of how ‘mainland Indians’ look upon Indians from the northeastern region bearing Mongoloid features. In Jaipur last month, a schoolteacher told a woman from a publishing house how she first thought she was Japanese and was impressed with her fluent Hindi. The teacher had no intention to offend the lady from Delhi who is originally from Manipur. Indeed, her intention was to compliment her in a strange, roundabout way. And, even as i was shocked, no offence was taken by the Manipuri lady. 

    Discrimination has two components to it: one, recognising the distinction between, say, people bearing Mongoloid features and those bearing Caucasoid features, an ability that is as helpful as that of being able to differentiate between a mosque and a temple, or an Audi and a Skoda. And two, there’s discrimination where the ability to make a distinction leads to prejudice. 

    It is this second variety of discrimination that needs to be – and can be – weeded out. This is possible not by striking at the proverbial source of the problem – ‘by changing the social mindset’ – but by addressing the problem at the spot where prejudicial discrimination comes to be redressed: before the law. 

    Almost two years before Nido’s death, 19-year-old Loitam Richard from Manipur was found dead in his hostel room in Bangalore. The local police first employed Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code to describe death ‘under mysterious circumstances’ that didn’t rule out murder, accidental death or suicide. Later, the hostel supervisor filed a fresh complaint against two fellow students who reportedly beat up Richard the night before his body was found. The police then filed the case under Section 302 (murder) of the IPC. 

    The tardy gathering of evidence, compounded by the initial suspicion that ‘the northeast boy’ was a drug-user and his death was caused by an overdose, was standard operational procedure. Richard was found dead in April 2012. The case is yet to reach the courts. And since the incident didn’t take place in, say, Australia, the media barely noticed. In any case, there is no ‘consul general of Bangalore’ to haul up and grill in television studios. 

    The law and order machinery across India is dysfunctional. But added to this is selective dysfunction – along socio-economic, caste, religious, regional and racial lines. The police, irrespective of what the Constitution says about legal recourse for ‘everyone’, behave differently when the complainant is from a slum and when he is from a highrise. A similar selective response holds true when it comes to complainants from northeast bearing physical features considered by far too many Indians, law enforcers included, as ‘un-Indian’, which in turn are hitched to stereotypes such as drug use and promiscuity. 

    This is what happened when the brutal rape and murder of Thangjam Manorama in 2004 in Manipur by some armymen led to a commission of inquiry whose report was never released and no perpetrators punished. This is what happened with investigations and subsequent (lack of) legal proceedings in the Loitam Richard case. This is what is happening with investigations in the Nido Tania case, where the Delhi high court has slammed the police for failing to even submit the victim’s autopsy report more than a week after his death. 

    As a nation, we are hardwired to see racial prejudice only where Indians are victims and where ‘white people’ are perpetrators. But racism against Indians by Indians thrives. And neither is it confined to the attitudinal behaviour of ‘mainland Indians’ towards ‘northeasterners’, the latter also capable of their very own brand of xenophobia. 

    For the ‘social mindset’ to change, the law must first treat, and be seen treating, crimes – including non-racist crimes – against northeast Indians seriously. It is how law enforcers deal with cases in which ethnic or racial minorities are victims and complainants that will determine whether India confines itself to benign discrimination. Until then, constitutional exceptions will continue to prove a shameful rule. 

 The writer is an author and journalist.

Source: Times Of India, Hyderabad 10/2/2014
Share:

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Articles

SUBSCRIBE

Thangkhal Bible in Mobile

Mobile phone a Thangkhal NT Bible koih ding dan

Read Thangkhal NT Bible

JOIN KV fb

ZOMI FINS

PHOTO GALLERY

THANGKHAL COSTUMES
TBCWD TOUR 24-Sept-2022
Kulhvum Prayer

Blog Archive