Peace Routes Must Respect Fragile Realities in Manipur

THE call by the Committee on Tribal Unity (COTU), Sadar Hills, to halt a proposed cycling event through Kangpokpi District is not a rejection of peace, but a plea for prudence. In a land scarred by prolonged ethnic violence and deep mistrust, symbolism matters as much as intent. The so-called “Manipur Peace Route”, proposed under the banner of harmony, risks becoming an exercise in insensitivity if it ignores the lived realities of communities along its path. Peace cannot be pedalled through contested spaces without dialogue, consent and careful timing.

COTU’s concern is rooted in context. Kangpokpi District remains fragile, and the memories of violence are neither distant nor abstract. The proposed event coincides with the Christmas season, a period of deep spiritual and cultural significance for the predominantly Christian Kuki-Zo community. At such a time, any activity perceived as provocative—however unintended—has the potential to unsettle an already tense environment. The editorial responsibility here lies in recognising that peace-building is not about public spectacle, but about empathy, restraint and respect for community sentiment.

The authorities, therefore, face a test of judgement. Allowing the cycling event to proceed against expressed objections would signal a troubling disregard for ground realities. COTU’s warning—that responsibility for any fallout would rest squarely with the state—should not be dismissed as rhetoric. Preventive governance is not weakness; it is wisdom. In Manipur’s current climate, the path to peace is narrow and uneven. True reconciliation demands patience, consultation and the humility to pause. Sometimes, the most responsible decision is not to move forward, but to stop, listen and reassess.

Share: